Link Updated
Two Reeds:
Manichean TryUnism
[Saved in Draft: Fully read, and finally posted 4-18-10]
[12-19-11 Punderous Pondering and Try-Unism added for search purposes.
Awe heck it didn't work]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Punderous Pondering. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Punderous Pondering. Sort by date Show all posts
Friday, April 16, 2010
Tuesday, February 16, 2016
Wednesday, March 02, 2016
Friday, April 20, 2012
State of Politics
Speaking of Johnsons*,
CAD(Culturally Aided Designs)
Objective/Subjective
Ge-oh-me-try!
The Presidents Club
The origins of this club in Hoover and Truman, harken back to mark a distinct difference in the act of presidential transitions, from the Bill Clinton/George W. Bush, George W. Bush/ Barack Obama turnovers. Is it fair to mark the common factor, when congressional partisanship also plays a part? Or is it fair to ask if Hoover could change, what change will Romney bring? Do we want to change course** or is it still our turn? [Ctrl F "still"]
*Andrea Mitchell interviews author(The Presidents Club)
** NOW with Alex Wagner (need^ update)
[Polling Seg Way*** ? See AM* Gimmickry or plans ?]
*** WOE (and Bashir)
[Must search for Manichean links(or leaps) of punderous pondering and other posts for Ant and Grasshopper and "render unto Caesar".]
^ color of change?
(see CAD: cause affect difficiency)
[4-24-12 link inserted@ ^ update, not ]
CAD(Culturally Aided Designs)
Objective/Subjective
Ge-oh-me-try!
The Presidents Club
The origins of this club in Hoover and Truman, harken back to mark a distinct difference in the act of presidential transitions, from the Bill Clinton/George W. Bush, George W. Bush/ Barack Obama turnovers. Is it fair to mark the common factor, when congressional partisanship also plays a part? Or is it fair to ask if Hoover could change, what change will Romney bring? Do we want to change course** or is it still our turn? [Ctrl F "still"]
*Andrea Mitchell interviews author(The Presidents Club)
** NOW with Alex Wagner (need^ update)
[Polling Seg Way*** ? See AM* Gimmickry or plans ?]
*** WOE (and Bashir)
[Must search for Manichean links(or leaps) of punderous pondering and other posts for Ant and Grasshopper and "render unto Caesar".]
^ color of change?
(see CAD: cause affect difficiency)
[4-24-12 link inserted@ ^ update, not ]
Monday, November 21, 2011
A Revolution?
[Finally posted 11-29-11]
See "A wonder" (update) 11-22-11 And The Daily Show CTRL f cheese. Non Exclusive Maddow search later.
Original intent. Yogurt? No, Romney. No comma. Intestinal fortitude? Or bacterial tubes.
[Steele Matthews? kiss up ? Draft three? True Footnote. Punderous Pondering? Or bubble up?]
{Breaking a leg or trickle up? Jonathan Chaite. A romance with Obama? But what is relative? Salon pushes and the GOP? Thrilled by table. Another article in revolution.}
{This post is very anachronistic, not published yet. The links are but not "A Revolution". Speaking of tragedies, I forgot that today is the 48th observance of the assasination of President Kennedy.
See "A wonder" (update) 11-22-11 And The Daily Show CTRL f cheese. Non Exclusive Maddow search later.
Original intent. Yogurt? No, Romney. No comma. Intestinal fortitude? Or bacterial tubes.
[Steele Matthews? kiss up ? Draft three? True Footnote. Punderous Pondering? Or bubble up?]
{Breaking a leg or trickle up? Jonathan Chaite. A romance with Obama? But what is relative? Salon pushes and the GOP? Thrilled by table. Another article in revolution.}
{This post is very anachronistic, not published yet. The links are but not "A Revolution". Speaking of tragedies, I forgot that today is the 48th observance of the assasination of President Kennedy.
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Un-Exceptionalism
Are there conflicts of interest in economics today?
Undoubtedly[!]
Buy definition and nature.
This may take us back to my Try-UNism, and one, none or all of punderous pondering.
[Mid-post tangent and update.]
No Twain in Try-ing. Well, I did not mean to display un-exceptionalism by example, as in "there he goes again." But my original point was that conflicts of interest are what economics and politics and government are all about. There, is that clear enough?
The "Try-UNism" is a pun in this regard. A sorting of one, none or all. Now, technically the physics might be beyond anyone to say if freedom is a force, and psychologically it may be closer to philosophy for some. But economically, I am saying that without an intent, we will be getting only where we are going, and even that is not a won way street.
My apologies for any missed links or leaps(in your scroll or click-on), but it is an ongoing process. Economics contains and is about conflicts of interest, and politics and government, play crucial rolls for (sum) people.
In regards to my lede, Un-Exceptionalism, I take it from one of the economists, who notes that any field will present conflicts of interest between the professional and the profession or the field if it has a purpose other than the individual. Well, he did not go that far, but I think he could. The "one, none or all" of my tangent relates to Exceptionalism, as it is seen, possibly in that light.
BTW: The first three links are an economic series of videos. Other links may require clicking on and scrolling the link address for a compendium of purpose. For example, "Buy definition and nature". The first two simply reference the ledes. The "be-all-and-end-all" a reference from part 3 of series. The "funny-thing-happened" is a recap of the CW. And regarding "nature" the address is a search of my blog for "Adam+Smith"(without, now with the quotation marks). Skipping over the "Try-UNism" and "Mid-post tangent"(lines) the Twain is deeply embedded in Trying.
[Speaking of exceptions(won): just to be sure.]
[Insert more Ed here and here: enthusiasm gap]
Undoubtedly[!]
Buy definition and nature.
This may take us back to my Try-UNism, and one, none or all of punderous pondering.
[Mid-post tangent and update.]
No Twain in Try-ing. Well, I did not mean to display un-exceptionalism by example, as in "there he goes again." But my original point was that conflicts of interest are what economics and politics and government are all about. There, is that clear enough?
The "Try-UNism" is a pun in this regard. A sorting of one, none or all. Now, technically the physics might be beyond anyone to say if freedom is a force, and psychologically it may be closer to philosophy for some. But economically, I am saying that without an intent, we will be getting only where we are going, and even that is not a won way street.
My apologies for any missed links or leaps(in your scroll or click-on), but it is an ongoing process. Economics contains and is about conflicts of interest, and politics and government, play crucial rolls for (sum) people.
In regards to my lede, Un-Exceptionalism, I take it from one of the economists, who notes that any field will present conflicts of interest between the professional and the profession or the field if it has a purpose other than the individual. Well, he did not go that far, but I think he could. The "one, none or all" of my tangent relates to Exceptionalism, as it is seen, possibly in that light.
BTW: The first three links are an economic series of videos. Other links may require clicking on and scrolling the link address for a compendium of purpose. For example, "Buy definition and nature". The first two simply reference the ledes. The "be-all-and-end-all" a reference from part 3 of series. The "funny-thing-happened" is a recap of the CW. And regarding "nature" the address is a search of my blog for "Adam+Smith"(without, now with the quotation marks). Skipping over the "Try-UNism" and "Mid-post tangent"(lines) the Twain is deeply embedded in Trying.
[Speaking of exceptions(won): just to be sure.]
[Insert more Ed here and here: enthusiasm gap]
Saturday, February 01, 2014
Jack Tapper / President Obama
Saturday, December 01, 2012
DECEMBER 2012 FOOTNOTES (fn) PAGE
[Begun 12-3-12.]
12-28-12 [ = (b.s.)pondering :
State of Politics
A Revolution? (scroll click)
Un-Exceptionalism (SC)
Punderous Ponderings (ibid) ] = /knot/ ( Try-unism ? ! ? ) ?
& (this is a test of sorts under the classification of filters/sources and progress)
12-22-12 Speaking of Will to Footnotes:(I will note the sequence of my link inserts{such})
Speaking of ge oh metric(or me trick) projects. (fn)GIGO(or MoJoe)
{ge oh metrics}
me
trick
projects
{speaking}(to be continued or Kantinued)
12-21-12 ^^ "paradox placement" anachronistically where the *ouch* was where the "pas" link is Treason of Imagery, with the "pax" link inserted retroactively, and lastly the "ouch" link inserted All to pun(or parse) on pause, stiob and SignField)
12-20-12 By golly of sorts ^ (i.e. by google, by stiob)
Under the IS(^) is 5A, and here they Be ! (or R )
12-19-12 : Presidential Press Conference.
Links from bottom up.
"text"= (b.s. slippery=slope) a. Try Angle b. The Nature of Things^
e.^ Flow of Conscience (a. thru s.)
"conn"(b.s. P+B+M+P) a. #1 Discipline - Philosophy ^^ b. The Tetrahedron Ramble* c. Looking Back, and Moving On. d. Proof of Process? e. Geometry of Purpose f. Use of Labels g. Rachell Maddow Wants You! [talking points] h. The Mess Age is the Message!
(1st)link: Presidential Press Conference
[pun on conn text: we have the conn!]
^ scroll over in-directly effective
^^ technically only a.^^^ works in scroll over
(i.e. rest link previous post)
^^^ except d. and f. for some reason
12-18-12 Perspectivism : a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l ?
12-18-12 "buying a stairway" (POSTED 12-17-12) [under consideration]
12-5-12 Joke of the Year!
http://www.seattlepi.com/news/politics/article/Analysis-Obama-could-risk-going-over-cliff-4091855.php#ixzz2EC9tWNey
political = Contempt for Courage
leverage = Fiddle Sticks^
Ctrl F = Nail Meet F--C---[!] (Full Crumb?)
time = (b.s.) "will+expire" (FN) ALSO Re:"time" will expire.
12-4-12 Pre-Pan FRY :
Original links pre-comment.
Why It's Hard to Replace the 'Fiscal Cliff' Metaphor.
asterisks.
[ read. ]
*** (kitchen)
[Post-comment]
12-4-12
The Place for Politics link that triggered my comment is not yet found.
12-2-12: as amended:
... Re:sources - not too pan or FRY.]
[...prE-links and post ponds.]
BTW: Is it better to fry two fish with one pan than kill or flip any birds or count bushes?
[Pre-C Hawks ?! ]
12-1-12 Links inserted. * Not too Die-jesting [!]
Washington Week
Facts...
algorithms
leverage
(rough issues/links)
12-3-12 Fiddle Sticks (hyperlinks included in pst as follows)
Boehner tells Geithner, ‘You can’t be
White House to GOP: It’s your move
“The Hobbit” is not a hipster!
12-28-12 [ = (b.s.)pondering :
State of Politics
A Revolution? (scroll click)
Un-Exceptionalism (SC)
Punderous Ponderings (ibid) ] = /knot/ ( Try-unism ? ! ? ) ?
& (this is a test of sorts under the classification of filters/sources and progress)
12-22-12 Speaking of Will to Footnotes:(I will note the sequence of my link inserts{such})
Speaking of ge oh metric(or me trick) projects. (fn)GIGO(or MoJoe)
{ge oh metrics}
me
trick
projects
{speaking}(to be continued or Kantinued)
12-21-12 ^^ "paradox placement" anachronistically where the *ouch* was where the "pas" link is Treason of Imagery, with the "pax" link inserted retroactively, and lastly the "ouch" link inserted All to pun(or parse) on pause, stiob and SignField)
12-20-12 By golly of sorts ^ (i.e. by google, by stiob)
Under the IS(^) is 5A, and here they Be ! (or R )
12-19-12 : Presidential Press Conference.
Links from bottom up.
"text"= (b.s. slippery=slope) a. Try Angle b. The Nature of Things^
e.^ Flow of Conscience (a. thru s.)
"conn"(b.s. P+B+M+P) a. #1 Discipline - Philosophy ^^ b. The Tetrahedron Ramble* c. Looking Back, and Moving On. d. Proof of Process? e. Geometry of Purpose f. Use of Labels g. Rachell Maddow Wants You! [talking points] h. The Mess Age is the Message!
(1st)link: Presidential Press Conference
[pun on conn text: we have the conn!]
^ scroll over in-directly effective
^^ technically only a.^^^ works in scroll over
(i.e. rest link previous post)
^^^ except d. and f. for some reason
12-18-12 Perspectivism : a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, j, k, l ?
12-18-12 "buying a stairway" (POSTED 12-17-12) [under consideration]
12-5-12 Joke of the Year!
http://www.seattlepi.com/news/politics/article/Analysis-Obama-could-risk-going-over-cliff-4091855.php#ixzz2EC9tWNey
political = Contempt for Courage
leverage = Fiddle Sticks^
Ctrl F = Nail Meet F--C---[!] (Full Crumb?)
time = (b.s.) "will+expire" (FN) ALSO Re:"time" will expire.
12-4-12 Pre-Pan FRY :
Original links pre-comment.
Why It's Hard to Replace the 'Fiscal Cliff' Metaphor.
asterisks.
[ read. ]
*** (kitchen)
[Post-comment]
12-4-12
The Place for Politics link that triggered my comment is not yet found.
12-2-12: as amended:
... Re:sources - not too pan or FRY.]
[...prE-links and post ponds.]
BTW: Is it better to fry two fish with one pan than kill or flip any birds or count bushes?
[Pre-C Hawks ?! ]
12-1-12 Links inserted. * Not too Die-jesting [!]
Washington Week
Facts...
algorithms
leverage
(rough issues/links)
12-3-12 Fiddle Sticks (hyperlinks included in pst as follows)
Boehner tells Geithner, ‘You can’t be
White House to GOP: It’s your move
“The Hobbit” is not a hipster!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)